Nordic One Health Dialogue Event Recap
Updated: Apr 10
On 7 November 2025, Infectious Disease Alliance (IDA) organised the Nordic One Health Dialogue (NOHD) in Copenhagen, Denmark. Held the day after the WHO/Europe–Danish Government International One Health Conference, the Dialogue brought together policymakers, researchers, and civil society representatives to discuss how the Nordic region can strengthen its contribution to the global One Health agenda.
Objectives of the Dialogue
Prioritise One Health in Nordic official development assistance (ODA) by demonstrating its relevance to global health security, pandemic preparedness, and sustainable development
Highlight the role of civil society in shaping ODA priorities and amplifying advocacy for increased investment in One Health
Support capacity-building in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) through Nordic partnerships focused on surveillance, prevention, and cross-sectoral response
Mobilise Nordic influence within EU and multilateral ODA agendas to position One Health as a defined funding priority and strengthen global policy alignment
Foster cross-sector dialogue to advance innovative and actionable financing mechanisms for One Health
The Dialogue featured
Keynote addresses examining the operationalisation of One Health across governance, policy, and financing systems
A high-level panel discussion focused on how Nordic leadership can transform One Health commitments into sustained and equitable action within development cooperation
Key takeaways
Integrate One Health into ODA strategies through dedicated funding and measurable targets
Invest in data systems and infrastructure to support surveillance and coordination
Build sustainable, long-term partnerships that strengthen local ownership
Strengthen communication and advocacy to increase political and public engagement
Keep environmental sustainability at the centre of One Health implementation
Full Report:
Phần tổng kết về Nordic One Health Dialogue Event cho thấy sức khỏe con người, động vật và môi trường không nên bị tách thành những câu chuyện hoàn toàn riêng. Tôi thích cách bài ghi lại cuộc đối thoại thay vì biến sự kiện thành một bản tuyên bố quá lớn. Những vấn đề liên ngành như vậy thường cần người đọc kiên nhẫn, bởi không phải ý nào cũng có kết luận ngay. Tôi đọc bài vào lúc đang nghỉ và chợt nhớ vài cuộc trò chuyện trực tuyến, nơi có người nhắc SUNWIN khi nói sang lĩnh vực game bài đổi thưởng. Tôi chỉ biết đó là một tên riêng, chưa từng sử dụng. Cảm giác sau bài…
When it comes to choosing a comfortable place for a short stay, one clear example can stay with me longer than a long list of general points. The rhythm of a stay depends on practical details as well as the view. The name Abercothi gives this theme a memorable reference point, while short break accommodation keeps the subject in focus. I am still thinking through the practical side, because the context can change what seems useful. What would you want to know before choosing an unfamiliar place to stay?
The theme of making room for playful everyday routines makes me curious about what people notice in their own everyday experiences. A familiar routine can still offer opportunities for curiosity and small discoveries. With Activepawsfitness in mind, playful everyday activities feels like a topic worth exploring one question at a time. It leaves me curious about the steps between understanding an idea and putting it into practice. What would you change to keep an ordinary activity interesting without making it complicated?
The idea of developing a closer ear for music gives me a reason to slow down and consider the details. Listening for one phrase can make a familiar piece sound different. That is why the connection between 3chordsfestival and music listening and practice makes me want to think through an example. That is the part I would keep thinking about after moving on to something else. Which detail would you focus on before listening to the whole piece again?
What interests me about thinking about how spaces and furniture are used is how a broad idea becomes part of an ordinary day. A room works differently when its layout reflects the activities people actually do there. I would connect Thurstontables with everyday interior design through an ordinary example rather than a broad claim. A simple comparison would help me picture the differences without rushing towards a fixed answer. What would you observe before deciding which part of a space to change?